There are many factors that go into a movie’s box office performance. The cost of production, the number of prints and commercials, the subject of the story itself, the director in charge, the stars attached to the project, a clever marketing campaign, etc. can all contribute to the quality of a theatrical film. With the cost of movies steadily increasing, the risk of a box office flop is more present than ever.
Over the past decade, some of the most revered filmmakers in film history have suffered some of the biggest box office failures of their careers. Many other extremely well-made and critically-acclaimed films released in the 2010s have come and gone without the mass reception they deserve, many of which should be revisited by moviegoers for various reasons.
9 Hugo (2011)
Martin Scorsese’s sincere love letter to the birth of cinema in Hugo cost around $ 150-170 million to produce and grossed $ 74 million domestically, losing about $ 90 million in the process. Despite the failure, the film currently holds a 93% Certified Fresh Rotten Tomato rating to go with an IMDb rating of 7.5 and 83 Metascore.
Hugo deserves more love for various reasons. First, Scorsese’s immersive use of cutting-edge 3D and ambient entertainment in early 20th century Paris is truly captivating. Second, the film epitomizes Hugo Cabret’s childlike wonder as he learns about the directorial talents of film pioneer George Melies. The film is entertaining and educational and is enhanced by its Oscar-nominated cinematography and compelling visual effects.
8 John Carter (2012)
Losing between $ 129 million and $ 225 million according to reports, Disney’s John carter is arguably the most infamous big-budget flop of the decade. However, with a 6.6. IMDb rating, 52% Rotten Tomatoes score and 51 Metascore, reception of the film suggests that it is slightly above average and deserves another look.
Panning for an inconsistent and unoriginal storyline, there’s no denying the excellent supporting cast, stunning visual design, the striking visual effects of Alien Tharks, and the sprawling size and scale of the film’s action scenes. The source material of the film has served as a template for modern science fiction shows such as Star wars. Like a good old-fashioned Hollywood escape, John carter needs a second chance to be fully appreciated for what it inspired and for what the film accomplishes with its fantastic visuals.
7 The Good Dinosaur (2015)
While most agree that The good dinosaur is slightly below Pixar’s standards, the film was still wrongly skipped at the box office in 2015. The highly entertaining, sweet, and assertive family film cost around $ 200 million and lost around $ 90 million in theaters. Despite this, the film racked up a 76% rating of Certified Fresh Rotten Tomatoes to go with an IMDb rating of 6.7 and 66 Metascore, indicating that the film is far above its box office performance.
The good dinosaur deserves another look because of its multi-textured visual design, wacky sense of humor, adorable characters, hidden Easter eggs, and clever story for a younger family movie. Like the best children’s films of the past, The good dinosaur teaches the importance of friendship and family in a way that doesn’t condescend to its target youth audience.
6 Uncle’s Man (2015)
While Guy Ritchie is King Arthur: The Legend of the Sword could also be included, his previous film Uncle’s man was the most disappointing bomb at the box office. Adapting a 1960s TV show turned out to be a misguided move to catch young eyes, resulting in a loss of over $ 80 million. Still, the film has an IMDb rating of 7.3 and a 68% Rotten Tomatoes score, indicating that it is much better than its performance would suggest.
Praised for its kinetic style, vibrant energy and elegant visual panache, Uncle’s man also deserves to be revisited for its fun, exciting Impossible mission-like action sets and towering performances by Henry Cavill. Ritchie’s skillful mastery over the meticulous details of the era, the beautiful comeback costumes, and the witty beards swapped between the two main characters give the film a vintage texture in a modern world that feels refreshing and unique.
5 The BFG (2016)
With a beloved source novel by Roald Dahl and the most successful director of all time at the helm, the much-loved Steven Spielberg The BFG was a surprising box office flop in the summer of 2016. With an emotional performance by Oscar winner Mark Rylance as the titular giant, the film certainly deserves another chance, especially given its rating of 74% certified fresh rotten tomatoes and a metascore of 66.
The BFGThe bewitching motion capture technology of is one of the main reasons to watch the film, as Spielberg is always at the forefront of cinematic gadgets. The film is accessible to the whole family, transcending the beloved source material in a magical way that only Spielberg’s large and massive vision could achieve.
4 Ally (2016)
While war films can be hard to sell, the star power of Oscar-winning movie stars Brad Pitt and Marion Cotillard should guarantee success. With Robert Zemeckis, who has made some of the highest grossing films of all time, at the helm, the box office failure of the 2016 film. Ally is even more curious. The film cost around $ 85 to produce and failed to earn even half that figure at the domestic box office. The film lost around $ 80-90 million depending on inflation, despite rave reviews for its two tracks with a respectable 7.1 IMDb, 60 Metascore, and 60 Rotten Tomatoes ratings.
Ally deserves a second chance because it embodies classic storytelling that doesn’t rely on cheap gimmicks or unnecessary twists. The movie depends on the timeless tools that make for a great movie, a gripping story, brilliant direction, and combustible chemistry between two lovely big screen stars from a bygone era. These types of films are under increasing threat and need support to stay alive in the future.
3 Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Despite his poor box office performance, the overwhelming love and support for Blade Runner 2049 suggest that it should be revisited with more openness. Denis Villeneuve’s film is one of the biggest box office bombs of the decade, costing around $ 150 million to produce and losing around $ 80 million in sold movie tickets. Still, the movie holds a rating of 88% Certified Rotten Fresh Tomatoes, 81 Metascore, and 80 IMDb.
Despite the financial beating it took, the film deserves another look for its excellent use of light and shadow by Oscar-winning cinematographer Roger Deakins, Rick Deckard’s thrilling return to the franchise after 25 years, the unpredictable scenario from Hampton Francher and Michael Green, and the technical mastery of Villeneuve at the helm. Blade Runner 2049 is also the rare sequel that honors the original by taking the characters and themes of the original and further developing them to make them relevant to audiences today.
2 Terminator: Dark Fate (2019)
Surely because of Terminator fatigue and poor results from previous outings, Dark fate lost around $ 120 million at the box office in 2019, making it one of the biggest financial failures of the decade. As audiences avoided the film, viewers who watched it liked what they saw as Dark fate got a 70% score for Rotten Tomatoes and an IMDb rating of 6.2.
Terminator: Dark Fate takes the franchise in bold new directions while honoring the first two films. Plus, the film recreates the glorious blockbuster spectacle and relentless action that was sorely lacking in previous entries. Yet for the reasons mentioned, the film was unfairly dismissed by the masses despite Linda Hamilton’s notable return as iconic Sarah Connor and an emotionally resonant finale with Arnold Schwarzenegger reminiscent of the franchise’s best film, Judgment Day.
1 Deep Water Horizon (2016)
Due to the actual event it was based on and the hugely important topic of environmental protectionism, Deep water horizon should be mandatory despite being filmed at the box office in 2016. With top-notch gameplay across the board, the film recounts with exciting precision BP’s devastating oil spill in April 2010. Based on Of its budget and box office activity, the film lost around $ 100 million despite scoring 83% from Certified Fresh Rotten Tomatoes, 7.1 IMDb, and 68 Metascore.
Kurt Russell, John Malkovich and Mark Wahlberg all give formidable performances in the film, which mixes fascinating real-life characters with the visceral intensity of a major disaster action movie, providing engaging entertainment while also addressing an important issue surrounding the film. ‘environment. Plus, the gripping tension and suspense put on by director Peter Berg will keep viewers on the edge of their seats.
NEXT: 10 Movies That Got Sequels Despite They’re Box Office Bombs
10 scariest entities in horror movies, ranked